Welcome to Part Three of this three-part series on privacy coins. Here, I will make the concluding remarks of this series, proclaim my loyalties based on the analysis of Part Two, and plant my flag. This section gives some of my clear opinions on privacy coins, and analyzes my favorite privacy coin, Particl.
In my opinion, the most important feature of a privacy coin is its fungibility or its privacy features. In other words, can you send and receive money without transaction history being recorded and transaction amounts being known? This automatically writes off coins such as Dash and Verge that use inferior technology compared to other privacy coins, and do not provide full sender, receiver and transaction amount privacy. There is an interesting video by Gregory Maxwell, the creator of Coinjoin, with his opinions on Dash. It is a must watch. I am also principled in the fact that a privacy-focused cryptocurrency should require no trusted setup and so this also writes of Zerocoin and Zerocash coins, until these coins upgrade to a zero-knowledge proof system that has a trustless setup, something that is in the works. Zerocoin, I am still rooting for since implementation takes time. Zerocash's creator, however, has explicitly stated that they are interested in making it possible for criminals to be tracked while providing privacy for others.That is a minus for me but may be a plus for others. Leaving a backdoor for a coin that already has a trusted setup as a given, means that anything Zcash does in the future is tainted, for me. The knowledge that a founder sees it as a benefit to have the power to selectively grant privacy, is unsettling.
Other technical features such as a coin being based on Proof of Work or Proof of Stake consensus, or how the development began, are too specific to the individual user's preferences to make any broad statements about them. This also applies to many of a coin's attributes as listed in the Privacy Coin Matrix. Here, disagreements can become political or situation-specific in nature. For example, I prefer proof-of-stake, because a malicious actor has to go directly against his self interest, to launch an attack. But there are people who think that proof of stake is trash and that proof of work is also trash. There are different consensus mechanisms beyond these two, and you would have to do the research in order to understand them. Beyond providing privacy itself, how much value a coin's other features provide is up to you to decide. Some privacy coins have had specific issues in the past such as Monero having older transactions being traceable  or Dash being very centralized at its start. I also strongly prefer coins who have cryptographers that are pioneering, described in Part Two as doing active research or implementing code in new ways, rather than simply copying. This is important for security in the short and long term and rules out most other privacy coins for me. Flaws in code implementation must also be viewed within the context of how nascent the technology being developed is, as projects figure out how to meet the practical needs of end users. Most bugs can be fixed and the level of appropriate forgiveness or scorn is up to the end user. In terms of ability to quickly adapt when bugs are found, there may be some merit to looking at the development team's ability to handle them. For the reasons stated above, other privacy coins such as Monero, and Grin and Beam that are working on Mimblewimble, I respect.
My favorite privacy coin is the one I work with, Particl. The development team provides consistently secure code that has novel implementations of existing technology. They do not rush to release features when there are the high stakes of affecting the intimate financial details of its users. This core strength that I call 'good code' is the first reason why I think the project is exemplary. I will provide evidence of this 'good code'. This strength is not necessarily to say that it is the only project that has it, or that I think this is how the coin should market itself, but one of the reasons why I believe it will be around in the long term.
Particl is a privacy coin built on the Bitcoin codebase, using ring-confidential transactions (Ring-Ct) and stealth addresses, while building decentralized applications (dapps) on its blockchain. The first of these decentralized applications is a marketplace. But let's look at the currency itself as a privacy coin or privacy platform. The most interesting aspect of the cryptography used in the project is that it implements Ring-Ct on the Bitcoin codebase, and is the first project to do so. This is unlike Monero which was based on Cryptonote that had its own codebase, as described in Part Two. But for Particl, this means that the project follows the releases of Bitcoin, updating the added privacy features of Particl each time as well.
This is a unique feature of Particl, that will make it easier for other developers versed in Bitcoin to work on the Particl codebase in the future when more decentralized apps are built. There are other features that are unique to Particl as well and the project's technical achievements are highlighted by how much they are imitated. Being an open source project, the team is guided by its vision rather than profits. They are without technical documentation or active marketing but with open source code available on its Github. So, what began as a volunteer community project, first known as ShadowCash, has been quietly working in the background while other teams, with permission, take inspiration. One of Particl's core developers, Tecnovert (TV) is responsible for certain key innovations when it comes to implementing privacy technology on the most mature codebase, Bitcoin. These include that:
Particl was also the first coin to implement cold staking and hardware cold staking. Cold staking refers to that fact that stakers (who verify transactions in a proof of stake coin) can stake funds from a secondary wallet that stakes on behalf of the original wallet where coins are stored. Hardware cold staking allows this to occur even when those coins are stored in a hardware main wallet. This provides the highest security available for a proof of stake coin. To clarify, Blackcoin and Bitbay are two other coins that also had features called cold staking, but which were not actually the same as a second wallet staking on your main wallet's behalf even when the man wallet was offline. There was also another project called Stakenet simultaneously working on cold storage staking, but Particl was the first to implement its version on mainnet. Particl also consistently has some of the strongest development according to ranking systems that look at code commits and project development, such as one called Darpal Ratings that does a GitHub Code Audit.
Apart from stating these facts, there are multiple examples of projects using Particl's source code. Verge, a popular cryptocurrency that uses stealth addresses and Tor in its Wraith Protocol, directly uses the code from ShadowCash, Particl's source project, for its stealth addresses. And based on their roadmap, they plan to implement Ring-Ct, but this is likely to be Particl's implementation of Ring-Ct. This is a very popular cryptocurrency that does not offer true privacy and whose team has to wait to implement it's own privacy solutions.
Veil, a newer project that combines Zerocoin and Ring-Ct technology on the Bitcoin codebase, also uses code for Ring-Ct from the Particl project. Both Verge and Veil however do give credit to original development teams. There are also coins that imitate the user interface of Particl and Shadowcash, developed by Particl designers Gerlof Van Ek and Martin Allien. These include Spectrecoin, Moin, and TokenPay who even copied promotional slides (see the PDF version for images). This just seems lazy. There is also a new coin, which probably won't be around for long, that has copied Particl's code, imagery, and verbiage without giving credit and without leaving its project as open source, as stipulated in the license. I won't name it but it is important to note the volume of intellectual interest in Particl.
Apart from the high quality of the code itself, another one of Particl's core strength is its accessibility due to its being built on Bitcoin. This is a primary advantage over Monero, which also has 'good code' and an innovative development team that gave us Ring-Ct. Particl being built on Bitcoin means that it can take advantage of any new features that the arguably most stable and developed blockchain offers. This will also allow new developers to onboard with more ease in the future to build decentralized apps once the software development kit is released. Another feature of the Particl project that stands out is that its first decentralized application, a marketplace, is a real use-case scenario. There is currently no other marketplace like it, and it is a privacy coin first that acts as a platform, so a core feature of the marketplace is privacy. Furthermore, it is one of the few projects in the entire crypto space to actually have a product that can be tested, beyond simply being a currency. The marketplace is now in its alpha testnet stage.
These strengths are important but many people do not care about the background of a project, and do not want to or need to know the ins and out of a technology to use it. They want to know how it will benefit them and only want to hear about it when it is actually ready to be used. This brings me to the first issue that I can identify with the team.
Because my content is about authenticity, there are also some not as strong parts of the project that I like. I believe that, being an open source project, the core value provided by the Particl development team of steady innovation may not carry its appeal through in the long run when the time comes to introduce it to the broader masses. Particl is very big on development and just a little bit into marketing. Because it is open source, but lacking marketing, the value of the work done by the developers will not necessarily be clear to those who are most likely to benefit from it, even when the product is being used. This is because anyone can copy it, as seen above, and market it, perhaps before that other project's users even hears of the original source. One way I think this could resolve itself in the long run, is that the marketplace as a first application is very effective for a business model that will attract newcomers to using the coin. This can create volume relative to a limited supply, and so more funds for marketing. The marketplace will provide practical solutions to e-commerce such as a trustless escrow system, reducing barriers to entry for online e-commerce, and allowing sellers to keep their sales data private so they do not have to compete with the platform (as is the case with Amazon). For these reasons, I think that Particl has hit a home run with its first dapp idea. Most other competition in the privacy coin space offers the privacy features of a currency alone. This eventually sounds like noise to many users, when so many coins provide transactional privacy. But even if the Particl marketplace is only adopted by a small niche market, and is an example for future marketplaces, that's enough of a user base to affect volume and bring awareness to keep the project around despite a focus on building alone. Due to this, I think Particl is a highly underrated project.
Another concern is governance. This concerns the marketplace, and not the entire project, however, since the marketplace is only the first decentralized application. The community understands the economic incentives that will allow volume to come in the future. The community also understands the good that the marketplace can bring to the world, and its practical advantages from a business perspective. But I am not convinced that the community understands the full legal implications of opening a marketplace. Fortunately, the project team is very aware of these implications and is doing everything in its power to bring its vision to full actualization, while accounting for known regulatory guidelines. The initial version of the marketplace will also support public transactions as well. Nonetheless, it is only a concern, and I am in full support of the project and its first decentralized application. Future dapps could also bring success to the project as well.
I won't say that Particl is the best privacy coin, as I've stated in Part Two, but it is my favorite. Why? I work with them. In this context, I know what I'm talking about. It has a solid development team. It provides both a currency and a platform that's positioned for adoption since it's built on Bitcoin. And it has a great first product that will appeal to many different target markets, whichever the team decides to officially pursue. I highly recommend checking out the marketplace beta or looking into the GitHub repositories if you are more technically inclined. I also respect Monero, am looking forward to Mimblewimble implementations like Grin and Beam, Bitcoin's dandelion protocol implementation, if Zcoin does do it's Sigma protocol upgrade so that it no longer requires a trusted setup, and I follow coins like PIVX, a strategic partner of Particl's.
To conclude, I am personally fascinated by this space of emerging technology. I proudly work with the Particl Project and humbly submit to where privacy technologies lead in terms of which ones work best, and which ones stand the tests of quantum computing, FUD, regulation, and time.
You can watch the video version of Part 3 here.
If you enjoyed this guide, don't forget to Subscribe or follow. If there are things you think should have been included, or you want others to know, leave a comment. You can connect with me on Twitter @cryptoramble as well as read the article versions, with references included and ongoing updates, at cryptoramble.com/guide. So long. Until next time.
Originally published at cryptoramble.com on January 31, 2019.